Monday, October 29, 2007
Halloween is a big scam....
Posted by
d
at
1:38 PM
0
comments
Sunday, October 28, 2007
Moola.com ~ Not really FREE money
- Rock, Paper, Scissors, (with a catch)
- Hi-Lo - each player is dealth ten cards where they have to guess if the next card is higher or lower than the previous card. The catch is that you only get four "lives" and if you guess wrong, then you lose a life. You also have the option of locking in your guesses, however that will cost you a life too. The first player to make it to the end of their ten tries in as few lives as possible and with as many locked in cards as possible, Wins.
- Gold Rush- each player has six pieces of gold worth one to six pounds. There is also 6 pieces of gold left in the gold mine. Each player has to throw out a piece of their gold and then the gold mine has to throw out a piece, whoever threw out the piece that weighed more wins all three pieces. The first person to reach 32lbs of gold wins.
As you can see these are not games where you need intelligence or even skill. They are games of chance where you just need patience.
Why do I think moola is not a real money maker? First off the games are computer generated. As a test I played ten games of hi-lo. I noticed that the cards that flipped over where always against the odds. For example, I had a K of hearts. I predicted the next card would be lower. (A are high in this game). The next card was an A. I lost a life. I then had a 4 of spades. I guessed the next card would be higher. The next card was a 2. This happened so much that for now on I am almost tempted to always go against the odds.
My other reason is that most people play on the lower levels. Once you get to about level 10 or 11, its hard to find a human player, in which you are most likely going to be matched against a robot. Bots are programmed before the game even starts to win, lose or tie.
There are ways to increase your account balance. You can go to their booster zone where you can sign up for cash offers (which will cost you money or a credit card) and then you can add to your balance. There is also the search and win wheel where you can win up to $9000, however the most I have won on the wheel is .05.
How can moola afford to do this? They are fully funded by advertisers. Before you can even play a game you are forced to watch a short ad. Whats the catch? You have to answer a question about the ad, meaning you have to pay attention.
From my lurking around on the moola forums, I think the most I have seen someone cash out was $1000. Currently my account balance is $4.11.
I also think that "maybe" moola has it so you can only win so many games in a row. I have wasted a day on moola doing research and noticed that I never won more than three games in a row.
Oh and let me not forget that the more people you invite, then the more people that are in your "downline". You can then get a percentage of earnings from their winnings. Which is why people are so eager to give away their invites. If you are reading this commentary carefully enough, you will see where I have hyperlinked a way to get invites. :)
So with the right computer software and addicting chance games, moola has some beta testers hooked on their site, thinking they can win thousands to millions of dollars, which will most likely never happen.
And if someone does get to the top of the moola tower, I will eat my words and credit moola as a worthy gaming site.
Right now, the best thing about moola, is that it is free to play and you can win $10 or $20. And for some people thats worth it to them, spending hours on end on a gaming site. Personally I would rather get a part time job at mcdonalds and make an easy $10 in two hours. A lot faster than wasting my time on moola.
Posted by
d
at
1:51 PM
2
comments
Labels: moola
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Disclosure Policy
This policy is valid from 25 October 2007This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. For questions about this blog, please contact Dina at gregorystwins@yahoo.com.This blog accepts forms of cash advertising, sponsorship, paid insertions or other forms of compensation.This blog abides by word of mouth marketing standards. We believe in honesty of relationship, opinion and identity. The compensation received may influence the advertising content, topics or posts made in this blog. That content, advertising space or post will be clearly identified as paid or sponsored content.The owner(s) of this blog is compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. Even though the owner(s) of this blog receives compensation for our posts or advertisements, we always give our honest opinions, findings, beliefs, or experiences on those topics or products. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the bloggers' own. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.This blog does contain content which might present a conflict of interest. This content will always be identified.To get your own policy, go to http://www.disclosurepolicy.org
Posted by
d
at
11:36 PM
0
comments
Labels: Disclosure
Friday, October 26, 2007
Bumbo Seat Recall
The popular Bumbo Seat has been recalled. Apprantly the box shows pictures where you can sit the seat on a table, counter, or other elevated surface. Babies were flipping out of the seats, thus falling backward and hitting their heads and in some instances cracking their skulls.
Now I had two bumbos for my twins. It is very easy for a baby to flip out of a bumbo because my one twin did it a few times. She arched her back and popped right out. HOWEVER I never used the bumbo on a table or counter. Although the pictures on the box and website portrayed that you could, it just did not seem right to me. It seemed weird to have the baby sitting up in a seat on the table or counter. I always used the Bumbo's on the carpeted floor so when my one twin did pop out of her seat, she hit the floor. I immediately got rid of the Bumbo's after that as I figured they were unsafe.
Now my other question is, where were the parents when baby flipped out? I was always sitting with my twins when they were in their bumbos. If the baby had time to flip out of the bumbo and fall off of the elevated surface, then the maybe was most likely left unattended.
Either way, the BOXES have been recalled since the boxes portrayed an unsafe practice with these seats. The company is now issuing warning labels to stick on your seat and / or the box.
In short, this seat was not worth the money anyway and if you are considering buying one, DONT. Your baby is fine and content in it for a few months and then once they start crawling, moving or sitting up on their own, they want nothing to do with it, meaning $40 down the drain for you, or in my instance, $80. If you really really really want one, (which I do not think you should get one) then try and find one used on sites like ebay or craigslist. There is also an item out called Bebe Pod which is similar to the Bumbo. I do not recommend either seat. These seats were not available when my son was a baby and he did fine propped up on the couch next to me or with a boppy around him, and he actually sat up earlier than my twins did, meaning that the Bumbo could possibly hinder the skill of sitting up (solely my opinion).
Anyway, if you have one and had any experience with your baby falling out, then post a comment here. I am interested in what others have to say about it. You can also post a comment on my Review Blog.
Posted by
d
at
9:50 AM
50
comments
Thursday, October 25, 2007
So which is more important? The Iraq war or health insurance for children?

Yes so which is more important? President Bush does not feel that all children should have health insurance. From what I heard him say .."$83,000 does not sound poor to me..." really BUSH? Really? How do you know what other expenses that family has? How do you know if that person is living in a state where the cost of living is sky high? Why is it that you think that some children should have to go without health insurance because their parents should be able to afford it. There you go again bush man ASSuming things.
OH NO WAIT!!!! Now I know why you think that all children should not be elgible for this health insurance plan. Because you think its more important to spend 2.4 TRILLION dollars on the Iraq war. That is $8000 per american (man, woman, and child).
I am glad to see where your priorities are Mr. Bush.
Where is my Bush out of office countdown clock. I cant wait for the next election.
Posted by
d
at
10:00 PM
0
comments
Labels: health insurance, Iraq War, President Bush
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Republish Your First Post
I was surfing around in blogland today and came across a blogger named KirkM who issued a challenge. He said to republish your first post. Now although I have been blogging for awhile, I am trying to transition all of the internet attention from my family blog to this blog and my mommy reviews blog. Sooooooo here is the first post from this blog:
Friday, October 19, 2007
Britney Spears: panties, playboy, papparazzi
So while Britney is busy running over the feet of the papparazzi, Hugh Hefner says he will bring Brit on for some nude pics, but ONLY if she gets help first. Why Hef? You do not want a drugged up and naked alcoholic as your centerfold? Oh I see , you just want the girls to have a "semi" good girl image. Gotcha..!MYSTERY SOLVED: It has been determined that Britney does not wear panties because the cotton irritates her "ahem" you know, and if she wears panties, she gets spots and sores. I guess its easier to just go pantiless and show your goods to the world rather than get a different material panties.
Posted by
d
at
5:29 PM
1 comments
Labels: challenges
Do you have smoke detectors in your home?
If you do, great, now check the batteries! If you don't, then GET ONE NOW. I am utterly tired of watching the news and seeing people die in a fire and then come to find out that their home does not have working smoke detectors. Today in Philadelphia a woman and her niece were killed in a fire. The fire department was at their house two weeks ago and offered to install smoke detectors in their home. The residents of the home turned them down. Please please please if you do not have a working smoke detector in your home, GET ONE.
Posted by
d
at
12:37 PM
0
comments
Labels: fire, smoke detector


